yet they are one of the most misunderstood and
misused. A performance standard may be defined
as a mutual understanding between supervisor and
subordinate as to what constitutes acceptable per-
formance of a given task or operation. The
performance standard describes what, how much,
and how well work is to be performed. Properly
used, it is an excellent means of controlling the
quality and quantity of work to be performed.
The following section addresses managerial
styles and their characteristics.
MANAGERIAL STYLES
Most managers will develop a personalized
managerial style soon after being placed in a
position of greater responsibility. The style
developed by these managers might have been
influenced by the following:
Formal managerial training, such as
Leadership and Management Education
and Training (LMET)
The examples set by other managers
The examples set by authority figures
earlier in the managers life
Of the three major influences on the develop-
ment of a managerial style listed above, the last
is often the most influential. The subordinate may
wonder, Why is the boss always grouchy? or
express surprise that The boss is really showing
an interest in me and has offered to assist if any
problems should arise. If the RPC or RP1 is fre-
quently in a grouchy mood, this person may have
been reared in an atmosphere where parents or
others in authority were grouchy (whether real or
perceived). On the other hand, managers who
show real concern for assigned personnel may be
reflecting the atmosphere they have been exposed
to in their homelife. It is important to note that
managers can choose a positive leadership ap-
proach, such as the HIGH TASK/HIGH PER-
SONNEL style. This is one of four managerial
styles to be considered in this section.
LOW TASK/LOW PERSONNEL
A manager who has adopted the LOW
TASK/LOW PERSONNEL style of management
will not normally be advanced very high in the
Navy. The following characteristics are apparent
in LOW TASK/LOW PERSONNEL managers.
Loyalty
The LOW TASK/LOW PERSONNEL man-
ager is usually deficient in the area of loyalty. This
deficiency may be characterized by failure to set
the proper example for subordinates in the
following two areas.
PUNCTUALITY. The LOW TASK/LOW
PERSONNEL manager may display an indif-
ferent attitude in regard to reporting for work on
time. Since there is little striving for efficiency,
assignments are not always completed on time.
MILITARY APPEARANCE. Because of
general apathy, the LOW TASK/LOW PER-
SONNEL manager may not give attention to his
or her appearance. Sometimes uniform regula-
tions and grooming standards are not taken
seriously.
The LOW TASK/LOW PERSONNEL
manager tends to side with subordinates whenever
there is dissatisfaction with command policies, but
on the other hand, this manager sometimes uses
command authority to threaten subordinates who
step out of line. In essence, the LOW TASK/
LOW PERSONNEL manager is frequently incon-
sistent regarding programs and personnel
management.
Attention to Detail
The LOW TASK/LOW PERSONNEL
manager usually misses out on the finer details
of any discussion or assignment and often fails
to think things through. Without proper thought
and analysis on the part of this manager, it follows
that chaplains, division officers, and other super-
visors will have to repeat themselves many times
to ensure that the assignment or objective is
understood.
Also, this manager never bothers to take notes
for reference purposes and is, therefore, poorly
prepared to brief subordinates or to make pro-
gress reports.
Listening
The LOW TASK/LOW PERSONNEL
manager is not in the habit of listening closely to
those in higher authority or to subordinates.
Chaplains and subordinates alike may have to
repeat themselves several times because this
manager is not a good listener and will miss many
details related in discussions.
5-4